Portada del sitio > English > THE HISTORY OF HUMANITY: THESIS ON THE HISTORICAL ARC OF VALUE AND THE STATE 1

THE HISTORY OF HUMANITY: THESIS ON THE HISTORICAL ARC OF VALUE AND THE STATE 1

Viernes 1ro de agosto de 2025, por GCI

THE HISTORY OF HUMANITY: THESIS ON THE HISTORICAL ARC OF VALUE AND THE STATE GCI 1

No spectator and/or citizen knows much about what happens in that secret world of financial antimatter that rules from the shadows. And even if you find out and denounce what is happening, you will be accused of being a "conspirator"..., "that the banks control everything... it’s a right-wing idea"..., it’s "populism", that "plutocracy" too. How do you swallow the anti-inflammatory that the doctor gives you trusting science, without even knowing what it contains, or understanding what it bursts you! They are killing you, they are genociding humanity and everything living on the entire planet... and you keep swallowing anti-inflammatories... and "bank flexibilizations"..., also for our sake!
Communism 68-2019

1)The entire history of humanity is false, false systems, false progress, false explanations, false leaders, false gods, false saints, false enemies, false wars, false victories, false victims...

"History is made by the winners" goes the popular saying and it is confirmed by all the points.

Therefore, it is enough to ask "who are the winners?" to know who was building that false history, over thousands of years, to be able to answer not only the "who", but also the meaning of that falsification. The winners of history are those who have all the money in the world and all the power in the world.

Money and Power are in reality the same historical being, seen from different angles (economic/ideological, military/repressive...) and which is none other than what has historically been called capital. History has been falsified, invariably, in terms of the interests of capital and the State, of the very development of oppression and exploitation of humans.

2)It is like that, that "God created man in his image and likeness." In reality, it was the other way around, it always is and it was, the other way around: "it was man who created God in his image and likeness".

But even this last statement is very false. For man in general does not exist, it is an idealization of the concrete individual made by himself (narcissism). Man is in reality an idealization of the individual of bourgeois society, purged of his real misery. Moreover, it is an ideological construction of religions and/or social sciences made from capitalist "man", who is the only one who has free will and all the shit distilled by official science about liberty, equality and fraternity.

In reality, what is called "man" is a historical product much later than the invention of god and the reality of money (god = money) and, therefore, it is also absurd to say, with vulgar materialism, man created god. As the proletarian critique of political economy has shown, the man of equality, liberty, and fraternity is at the same time a social-historical fruit of the destruction of the human community, of the separation of man from nature, of secular exploitation, oppression, and despotism.

Even "freedom" has a totally different meaning in history than the falsehood we are told today! "Liberation", the creation of man free to buy and sell, is the product of a long historical process of state terrorism to separate human beings from their community and from nature, which leads to the deprivation of humans of all means of subsistence. Only in this way did capitalism create the free individual, dispossessing him, proletarianizing him, and who, therefore, has no choice but to sell his labor power to survive.

The more dispossessed he is, the freer he is to sell his life to capital in order to survive! In reality he is a slave, who is ignored! His situation has worsened so much that he is much less aware of his slavery, due to his submission to democratic ideology, than the slave alone.

But the ideological trap is even more perverse. When we speak of the man and free citizen, without quotation marks, we are not talking about the slave (salaried or not), but, on the contrary, we are talking about the bourgeois, the wealthy man, the power, the one who has the real freedom to buy and sell things and people and not the one who is sold as a thing.

It is the commodity ideology that, on the basis that the exploited can also buy and sell and is "free" to choose provided, of course, as the dispossessed, that he has sold well the only thing he has (be it the product of his labor, be it his labor power).

Falsification is in social reality and makes law the cynical falsification of what happens in real life. The equality, liberty and fraternity that are established as a formalization of the mercantile generalization, abstracts from the exploitation and domination of the class, existing in real history and establishes as the law of equality, liberty and fraternity, what in reality is exploitation, oppression, domination.

Moreover, when the historian, the economist... he speaks of "man"; he never thinks of the slave, but of the capitalist, of the plutocrat. The laws of the perfect market of political economy (perfect competition, both in classical and vulgar political economy) and in particular the law of labor value, are based exclusively on that free man, who exists only in the ideology of the ruling class.

It abstracts from real social life, from the true history of humanity. In the ideal market, the slave does not exist, nor do the three suits of the torture of work, which is why the productive activity of humans can be presented as a source of value, not only of use, but of value alone.

Hence the absurd idea that, in the origin, money was a commodity like all the others, as if value had arisen from the exchange of equals and its development. Instead of real history, political economy constructs a religion of history (whose maximum expression will later be Marxism-Leninism) in which the market of equals would be the subject of everything and money would be only the general equivalent that this market produces for exchange. From the true subject of history, value, capital thus becomes, in that kingdom of heaven, the result of the exchange of equals.

It is thus totally concealed that money, from its origin, is not only a means (of payment, of account, of circulation...), but an end in itself (objective), a social relationship, a "false" community between human beings and the true subject of history. History is not only the history of the class struggle as the classics said, but the history of humanity’s submission to that subject: capital and its organized power (the State, in the deep sense of that concept).

All this accumulation of lies is reproduced in an expanded form, as the starting point of political economy and capitalist commodity exchange, where, it is said, the commodity would have a double aspect (as if by chance egalitarian), use value and exchange value based on labor.

We do not start from the existence of God creating man, so we also reject that starting point of the exchange of commodity equals and the deliberate and fetishistic confusion of what it is the exchange of things that produces money.

On the contrary, it is money, value being valorized, capital that, oppressing and enslaving humanity, will create the fictitious market of equals. Value being valued secularly is the one that will be imposed by the dictatorship of "free trade", dominating the whole world, using, for this purpose. the war, the massacre and the genocide of every human population that does not accept this dictatorship of imperial free trade.

Even starting from the objects themselves that are presented as commodities in this rotten twenty-first century, we can discover that what is valued in this society is not at all a function of human needs, but of the historical dictatorship of value. All absolutely all the use values that reach the market today are not produced according to human needs, nor even on the basis of the free production of humans, but by the absolute despotism of valorizing value, that is, of capital. In every article, object or service that claims to be "useful" to humanity, the commodity reality of the dictatorship of value over use value is revealed in all its splendor and historical scope: from the means of mass destruction, to junk food, from the manufacture of toxins to the generalized poisoning of the environment, from Hollywood to Netflix..., to the "thing itself"... (use value), we only see a relationship of oppression, domination and slavery (exchange value, money, capital). Everything in commodity equality is a lie because the market, use value and exchange value..., is not the principle of anything (other than bourgeois ideology), but the result of thousands of years of dictatorship of value against human beings, of the historical oppression of the community of money destroying every form of really human community.

3)
Let’s go back to the official sentence ("God created man") and we clearly state that it: is pure propaganda. To put it in today’s terms: pure "fake", pure propaganda to dominate: how they created the lie of the Devil (today we would say "the story of") that possessed you or the virus that infected you.

The historical function of the creation of the gods (and their colleagues: devils and demons) was the work of power and money throughout the history of humanity.

Of course, even to reach this conclusion, it is necessary to make it clear that the "gods" of class societies have nothing in common with the historical energies and forces (such as cosmic energy, earth, fire, water, the feminine/masculine...) than the "primitive" human communities (where there were no classes, neither money nor the State made reference to) "ritualized" and what, the very powerful of today call "gods of primitive societies".

No, those communities did not have gods, they did not impose beliefs in powers alien to the experience of the community, such as gods in class societies and mainly money in monotheism. Rather, practically verifying that, these forces were the great subjects that regulated the life of ancestral communities, they personified them (but did not "deify") them in order to consciously affirm the role they really had as subjects, in common life.

In reality, gods and religions in the historical sense of the words, as superior and all-powerful powers, are creations of those who concentrate money and power in all kinds of societies and their central function is to elevate those classes and those powerful. Moreover, Money itself is invariably the God of minorities who consider themselves "chosen by God" to exercise their function as an oppressive aristocracy. The one god, monotheism, exists only where money as a community has become master of all social relations and that, consequently, the true human community is outside of it, outside.

The personification in the "previous" or "primitive" societies that the secular bourgeoisie will consider as "primitive religions" and will identify with "the pagan gods" or "barbarians", are not "gods", nor devils, nor will they be "religions" in themselves. These personifications obey, on the contrary, the brotherhood, the familiarity that humans felt and lived with the energies of the cosmos: mother earth; community/mother/sea; sun/fire/brother/father; ancestral community (sea/Imanjà), common spirit, of the sea, of the forest, water/earth/sister fertility... They are about the natural energies and forces that govern human life and its relationship with the micro and macro cosmos, when humans were not subject to money, nor to the power of the self-proclaimed "chosen people", which invariably is the aristocracy, although it is presented secularly as the religion (opium) of the entire (chosen) people.

The "men" who created the gods are exactly those who had concentrated the money and power for this and could later present themselves as demigods or as representatives of gods on earth: as the founding legends of all class societies in history. So those "men" were not just any man either, but propertied classes, plutocracies, despots, princes or pharaohs... all slave owners and exploiters.

The same is true of "God’s chosen people." In all parts of the world, it was NOT God who chose any people to oppress others. The matter was the other way around, a group of men of money, a social class, or the organization of a group of oligarchs, organized to impose their power, created a god (idealization of the very relationship of Money) to assign to themselves the title of "chosen".

That plutocracy consolidates its power as long as it can be disguised and assimilated with a "people", a "race", a "religion", a "country"... Here, too, the subject and the predicate are upset. In reality, there is no "chosen people" either, but that aristocracy, product of the very community of money, is championed by the "people" that is being subjected to its community of money and, in this way, presents the result (racist, nationalist, sectarian, supremacist ...) as if it were the secular origin of all life; the first engine of existence.

Those who have been rising to prominence as money and representatives of the gods, or as demigods, as appointed and chosen by the gods, are exactly those who needed to falsify history in that sense. The real story is the other way around. They are the money classes (the despots and their courts, the priests, priests and monks, the money issuers, the usurers, the traffickers, the military and all their intelligence and repression services, ...) who invented that god, who defines them, as a people or race chosen, by that invention. The blue blood of the aristocracy is just one more detail of the FALSE erected into real power.

This basic falsification of the history of humanity, by which the subject of that history is changed and placed in the world of the gods and the heavens, begins with class society itself, and always serves money and power, capital to consolidate itself.

The opium of the peoples has as its foundation this upheaval between subject and predicate; only in this way can the subject of oppression be hidden as a divine cause or of "human nature." That is why, thousands of years later, the same exploiting and ruling class can hide its crimes against humanity by saying that the fault for the catastrophe that humans are experiencing has "natural" causes ("the fault lies with the selfishness of men") or "the devil" (and/or microorganisms, aggressors that come from space, or contagion...). Or even worse: to present the historical class struggle against usurers, merchants and bankers as racist and even "anti-Semitic" struggles. It is exactly like this, the aristocracy and the world state of capital in the 20th/21st century reinvents the entire history of the class struggle to its advantage: the historical resistance against usury, taxes, exploitation and oppression would be nothing more than "terrorist", "racist", "anti-Semitic" struggles...

With that same logic, they blame "man" in general (as with the fake "global warming"), for "the crisis". And, when they declare war on humanity to reduce the world’s population, they hide their direct guilt in crime and genocide by blaming devils, viruses, and pandemics, at the same time that their protocols of domination advise the "cosmic" creation of the "common enemy" from which the "unification of earthlings" will come: the Blue Beam project(or project of divine illumination of the world government instrumentalized by the governments of the Algosaxon powers and instrumentalized by NASA).

4)
The true subject of the history of class societies has been money, power, which are two faces of the same historical entity, the same common being that (historically we have also called capital), enslaves humans.

Of course, this subject plays his historical role embodied in flesh and blood characters, who call themselves "human" and who, at the same time, consider themselves superior because of their blood, their race or because they have been chosen by money, that is, their God.

As if even with that, exploitation and oppression, true secular powers, could be hidden as a human quality!

"Power is money, money is power." This is a valid maxim today, as it was at the very beginning of societies of class domination and exploitation thousands of years ago. Everywhere, those who have power appropriate money, those who have money accumulate power. The whole world is run by capital, that is, by money and its power.

In reality, the historical subject of the domination/exploitation of the entire human race is only one, money/power. The history of humanity is the history of value imposing itself on the enormous variety of local modes of production and, subjecting them all to the production of money, to world capital. This secular world despotism will be concluded in the last 500/600 years with the universal dictatorship of money subsuming all local forms of production, that is, with the subsumption of all humanity in capital.

Since the beginning of class societies, the "things" produced have changed greatly, material production has been increasingly revolutionized, but the social relations of exploitation, oppression and domination have not only been maintained, but have become increasingly slave-like, tyrannical and despotic. Moreover, the dictatorship of value against human needs has become so despotic that the "goods" and services produced and determined by that dictatorship are increasingly alien to human needs: today more means of intoxication, poisoning, destruction are produced than there are means of human life. Worse, "goods" (as bourgeois economists like to call things and services) have nothing to do with "goods" for humans but are fundamentally "evils", means of human destruction such as weapons, repressive functions, the food industry, toxic agriculture, the chemical industry of medicines... or more generally still means of dehumanization and domestication such as armies, police, schools, state brainwashing structures, the entertainment industry...

INTERNATIONALIST COMMUNIST GROUP (ICG) 2024/25
https://icg-gci.kilombo.top/

¿Un mensaje, un comentario?

¿Quién es usted?
Su mensaje

Para crear párrafos, deje simplemente líneas vacías.