ICG-GCI

COMUNISM 19

2026-02-19T15:56:43Z

Translation of Comunismo magazine 70

- English

Comunism 18 -

GCI — 2026-01-01T15:28:00Z

[1]

Translation of Comunismo magazine 69

[1] COMUNISM18

COMMUNISME 68

GCI — 2025-08-25T15:43:00Z

- Français

COMMUNISM 17

GCI — 2025-08-15T20:09:00Z

Translation of Comunismo magazine 68

- English

Theses on the Historical Arc of Value and the State 7 THE HISTORY OF HUMANITY:(7)

GCI — 2025-08-07T08:10:00Z

Theses on the Historical Arc of Value and the State 7
By GCI

THE HISTORY OF HUMANITY:(7)

The historical arc of value/money, subjugating the human being by violence [IS] the greatest constant in the history of class societies! From "COMMUNISM 68"

22) It is also false to derive money from the exchange of things, as if the exchange of commodities and money were in human nature. Money is, on the contrary, a false human community which, by imposing itself (invariably by violence), destroys all true human community. Historically, money as a commodity is constituted in a social form by destroying the communities that it touches, that it penetrates. The community of money, as the one god of monotheism, and the biblical chosen people, does not tolerate any other social or community form and always develops by subsuming into its being all (other) types or forms of social organization. It is true that the mode of production of the objects necessary to live determines the social life of these societies, but it is necessary to add that everything that touches money destroys the community by imposing the society of Money: slavery. That is the social form and the mode of material production that the society of Money imposes.
The buyers and sellers of commodities and the society they constitute, of which economists speak, idealizing it, are in reality the result of the external intervention of money: human beings do not come into the world as buyers and sellers, much less as workers. It was the domination and exploitation of humans by Money that produced the society of workers, of exploited and subsumed in capital.
No, God did not create man in his image and likeness, nor does work create value, contrary to what the owners of value say. It was also the other way around. Money valorizing itself was what created work, or, rather, what subjected human beings to work.
The secular process of domination and exploitation is totally outside the officially accepted narrative. The great watchword of political economy and social history has been to cleanse capitalism of its true historical genesis, to blame all the "barbarism" on pre-capitalist societies (sic). What they hide from us is that the true historical process is carried out by MONEY itself, which, in its own process of valorization, is not only an organized power but also a "society" and more precisely, an expropriating community, a mode of world capitalist reproduction.
In this long historical process, money was subjecting its own society (imposing itself as a universal value: from which monotheism derives) to humans, whom it was uprooting from production and community life based on tribute, usury, debt issuance, kidnapping, war... (all forms absolutely slave-owning), to the fiat money of the central banks. Money itself and its issuance is the basis of all other forms of historical exploitation and slavery, because it includes and organizes them in the same way that they develop the concentration and centralization of capital (tendency to the constitution of World Money). That was the true capitalist mode of production, developing for centuries outside and against all pre-existing communities of local production.
The dictatorship of value over human use value reaches extremes that human beings never imagined. The survival of the human species and, more generally, of all living beings on the planet is totally threatened by the dictatorship of world capital. The absolute power of the world bankocracy, the dictatorship of the false, the absolute tyranny of value deteriorating the entire production of the objects necessary for human life (qualitatively and quantitatively) heralds even more social catastrophe. The sacrifice of material production itself to increase value today (which state environmentalism and the theory of degrowth endorse), will further strangle the proletarians in the coming years. Relative and absolute misery will take another gigantic leap when the real devaluation of all signs of value becomes effective.
COMMUNISM 68
23) It is logical that the capitalists, who define themselves as the working class par excellence (the proletarians being only the immediate executive hand of their "accumulated labor" in the past), maintain that their wealth comes from labor. But the historical reality of value is very different (not to say opposite). In reality, value, to the extent that it is concentrated and considered as such, is power. That is its only substance as a source of wealth: power of oppression, power of exploitation. Wealth and power, value and exploitation are historically the faces of the same oppressive BEING.
He was the "man" of the ruling and exploiting class who needed to create "god" (who, on the other hand, is nothing more than the idealized image of MONEY that can do everything) in his image and likeness, to become its representative and proclaim himself as the savior, as the caste or chosen people, in the face of all the dangers that lurked. The fear of natural catastrophes, hell and the devil, the terror of the unknown fostered and organized by the representatives of the afterlife (in reality of Money), are indispensable for real power to be considered salvation, courage, god, money... and can be concentrated in a class. The historical class that owns money is evidently the bourgeoisie and more particularly the plutocracy, which will be the agent of valorization of value for 6000 to 9000 years.
It is very likely that money, value, as debt, as credit, as the subject of human usury and slavery, is still much older than we are allowed to conceive today. All the sciences forged, as weapons of domination by plutocracy, try to limit the knowledge of nature (physics, chemistry, disease/health..., cosmography...), and of social history (domination/oppression/tyranny...); therefore, they only allow a limited and narrowly bourgeois horizon: modeled by the military of thought.
Value, money that, in the secular historical arc of domination and oppression, was transformed into power, into power, first as a treasure and little by little assuming itself as a value that is valued through war, slavery, usury, monetary credit issuance, trade..., is the true subject which subsumes all humanity in its being. For thousands of years, the colored mirrors, the community dazzled by the brilliance of Money, submitting to it, has replaced and destroyed the true human community...to the widespread subsumption of humans (and other living beings) in capitalism, to the supreme level we live in today: the openly genocidal war against humanity and against all human livelihoods, with racist, anti-terrorist, plandemic, climate, gender narratives,...
Logically, this bourgeois conception of history was born with the division of society into classes, with the conscious and organized organization of a minority that emerged from value in the process of social empowerment, as a result of tribute, usury, organization (and progressively) the issuance of debt (development of Fiat Money), enslavement and exploitation. To do this, they totally reify (falsify) social relations by fetishizing them, as they do with Money itself, which, instead of understanding it as a social relation of exploitation, they consider it as a means, as a mere product for exchange between equals.
The human struggle against Money and its false community is opposed in life to the house of falsehoods that constitutes science and in particular economic science. Instead of proclaiming that the struggle is (only) against "capital", defining itself by "work", as the bourgeois left does, the real struggle of humanity against exploitation has always been: struggle against work.
There is no point in the struggle against capital without the struggle against labor.
Against the lying pretense that humans can only reproduce their lives by submitting to work, and that communism would be the nationalization of capital and the generalization of labor for all, revolutionaries have always maintained that the destruction of capital requires INSEPARABLY the destruction of labor and the constitution of the COMMON life of humans who, as in the communist past, they will constitute the human community by producing without work.
24) If we were to accept, if only (as a laboratory hypothesis) to burst/criticize the periodization made by the bourgeois economy into "modes of production", the first thing we would see is that Money exists in all the "modes of production" of things... (with greater or lesser relative force according to times or places) and what it is, the mode of production of (money) capital which, in the final analysis, will subsume the entire production of objects, in its own being. Therefore, this periodization, describing human history, is not only false, but is constructed to actually hide the historical genesis of the social relations of exploitation by Money. The method is the very reification/reification as the historical foundation.
In addition, Money never arose in history from the exchange of equals, but from slavery, tribute (obtained by violence), usury, generational submission by "debt"..., the issuance of credit... Indeed, taking into account its genesis and history, far from money being a thing and although it has been represented by many things (shells, salt, wheat, metals...), money is a social relation of exploitation and domination that subsumes all immediate forms of production in the mode of production of capital. Money is the true God (monotheism) created by the man of the ruling class; he is the chosen one, as the "chosen people" by God (supremacism/fundamental racist) and, as such, tends to impose himself as ONE, SUPREME BEING.
In reality, it is the plutocracy that "chooses" Money to the extent that it imposes it on the world. Money in its process of accumulation, concentration and centralization, is constituting itself in world Money in the very process in which capitalism subsumes all humanity in its Being, in its FALSE human community.
The historical arc of value, which summarizes the history of the exploitation and domination of humanity up to the present genocidal war, carried out by the world aristocracy, has absolutely nothing to do with the scheme of political economy of considering capitalism as something after slavery, nor with the Marxist-Leninist scheme. on the evolution of modes of production (primitive, slave-owning, feudal, capitalist, socialist), which has always been a decisive weapon of the international plutocracy, in the FALSIFICATION of history.
The lie that the development of capitalism (bourgeois democratic tasks) towards socialism is necessary is not only a false and reactionary ideology, but has become the universal and practical policy of the entire dictatorship of bourgeois economy. That is exactly the practical policy imposed by Lenin and Trotsky in the service of the Jewish Wall Street bankers in the Russian counter-revolution from 1917 onwards.
"The only thing that was communist in Russia from 1917 onwards were the dead and the political prisoners", as the hundreds of thousands of proletarian prisoners locked up by the Bolsheviks of the first hour said. Bolshevik state terrorism was argued with the same dogma of the indispensable necessity, according to its leaders, to carry out bourgeois democratic tasks by imposing the development of capitalism openly AGAINST the historical resistance of the Russian (and world) proletariat.
The entire Russian and world counterrevolution triumphed, starting with the Bolshevik coup d'état of 1917, imposing the need for the development of bourgeois democratic tasks, that is, of capitalism against all pre-existing forms of resistance (the old agricultural community of all Great Russia, the MIR, associated by the secular slogan of "Land and Freedom"). The Leninist counterrevolution that imposes counterrevolutionary terrorism, sweeping away the communist resistance, is based on this falsification of the history of humanity according to the modes of production (of things) as necessary stages, to which the peoples must be subjected.
25) The negation (concealment) of the historical arc of value being valued, of MONEY/CAPITAL/POWER has been an ideological, political, military weapon... of the counterrevolution to perpetuate/"improve" that power.
The false narrative of the progressive changes in the "modes of production" (... slavery, feudalism, capitalism, socialism...) What developed classical bourgeois economics, to consecrate capitalism, as the final station of history, was renewed and reconditioned by the Marxism of the bourgeois parties for the workers (social democracy, which purged Marx's work of its subversive positions and built Marxism). The globalization of capital, which they called "socialism," was the contribution of the last phase, that of Marxism-Leninism as the state religion, to impose the world governance of labor as the central VALUE of human castration and generalized subsumption in MONEY.
AGAINST the historical arc of secular domination and oppression, against MONEY/POWER/CAPITAL/STATE..., humanity has fought and resisted with all the means at its disposal. Beyond the attempts to revive the COMMUNAL, that is, the various historical attempts to constitute IN the community of struggle, a real community of life (and of production for that community), the true invariant program of the revolution has been the negation...of absolutely the entire society of Money.
Each reappearance in force of the destructive human struggle of capitalism, that is to say, of the constitution of the proletariat as a class, and therefore in a party, in different localities and epochs, has affirmed different formulations for this total negation: destruction of private property, destruction of all governments and the state, destruction of money and commodities, destruction of the bourgeoisie and its tyrannical sects that run the world from the shadows (Judaism, Freemasonry, Jesuitism, Christianity, Islam, Zionism...), abolition of wage labor, abolition of slavery, abolition of labor... All of them are valid, because none of them can be separated from the total negation of MONEY/POWER, that is, from the total, practical and revolutionary negation OF CAPITAL AND THE STATE.
Only a generalized social revolution that encompasses the entire world will be able to stop the genocidal plans of Money and the world state, destroying this anti-human society to its foundations and reconstituting the universal human commune.
INTERNATIONALIST COMMUNIST GROUP (ICG) June 2025
https://icg-gci.kilombo.top/

THE HISTORY OF HUMANITY: THESES ON THE HISTORICAL ARC OF VALUE AND THE STATE 6

GCI — 2025-08-06T07:55:00Z

THE HISTORY OF HUMANITY: THESES ON THE HISTORICAL ARC OF VALUE AND THE STATE 6

{{}}
GCI

The progress of the capitalist productive forces is the progress of human slavery.
GCI 1979-2025
18)
Let us return, to conclude, to the globality of the historical arc of value valorizing, the summary of which we synthesize in our theses. The ideological denial of the invariance of value valorizing, of capital, as the key to exploitation, power and historical oppression, has been the constant in all the explanations (falsifications) wielded by the ruling class to present the present as a result of the perpetual progress of world capitalism. The use of the development of the productive forces (pre-eminence of things over social relations and the relations of humans with their environment and their community) always seeks to hide the invariance of capitalist slavery. The fetishism of things (as if material production determined the structure of a society) hides the ever-increasing sacrifice of the human being, showing the things of what capitalism is capable of, and even more, the "socialism" presented by Leninism, as nationalized capitalism, as the supreme level of capitalism.

Concealing the true history of humanity, the economists and social historians of the ruling class (together with the intelligence services, the armies, the universities, the parties and trade unions..., that is, the totality of the state apparatuses of world capital) put together the history of the progress of "things", that is, of the productive forces to sell their version (product), their brainwashing by virtue of the secular idyll of money and universal progress and concluded that the history of humanity should be defined by the stages of such progress: primitive society, slavery, feudalism, capitalism, socialism.

The reification (reification) of the world is the cornerstone of the denial of the "understanding" of history on the basis of relations of exploitation and power and the reduction of all social relations to the world of things and their progress. At the same time that they dazzle the world with the glitter of World Money as if it were only a thing chosen as money (theory of bourgeois political economy, including Marxism), just as "god" did with the "chosen people", it hides the degradation of things as if they had been chosen by humans: when they only obey, such as the weapons that destroy humanity, toxic industrial food and agrotoxic agriculture, to the interests of Money... (pound, dollar, yen...).

This fundamental falsification of the history of mankind dominates everywhere. Slavery is presented as the "freedom to choose" of the atomized and emasculated individual. The supreme level of it and the PLANS that ensure the secular tyranny of world money, such as the 2030 or 2050 agenda, as if it were the universal salvation of the planet and human beings, when in real life it tends to programmed genocide and the total extermination of the human community. This project leads, as has been declared, to reducing the world population from billions of people, to its idealized reduction to 500 million domesticated lambs in the service of the elect.

COLORED MIRRORS

They started buying things they had from the Indians and then with those same colored mirrors they bought them from them. The original communities made shit with those colored mirrors and those that could not dissolve with mirrors did so repressively (state terrorism): the Indians killed other Indians to obtain colored mirrors.

It is evidently the history of money, the imposition of labor and its international historical abstraction vis-à-vis the concrete man, of value in process vis-à-vis the community, of money to the exclusion of any human community.

In this historical process, the submission of the human being to the society of money implies simultaneously the objective and material submission to real money and the ideological submission to the images of the fantastic world of commodity idealization : the real exchange value and the colors and brightness of the mirrors, the metal of money and the idealized image that emerges from it as a foreign power. the real relation of production which exchange implies and the ideal relation which religion retains, the matter and the real brilliance of money, and the subjective dazzle described to us by the writers and philosophers of antiquity.

I think it is no exaggeration to say that Marx described this submission globally by placing the accent on material submission (properly speaking) and that Guy Debord rediscovered and exposed this double reality, fundamentally criticizing the dazzle that the image produces. Religion, literature, what was called art... it shows everywhere that submission of the human being to the idealized image of value.
MANUSCRIPTS 2004

19)
The bourgeoisie and its science have always made history start from value (of money and capital), not from value itself, but from labor. As if work had always existed or was the first engine of humanity, as if work were inherent to human beings and the economy regulated the world based on labor exchanges.

These are the bases of the falsification of history. The subject (human labor) is taken as what the predicate actually is. In reality, it is money, value, capital that, through expropriation, violence, domination and dictatorship, creates, imposes, labor; that is, slavery. It is not labor that creates value, but on the contrary it is money as a social relationship of slavery and oppression that, based on torture and oppression, imposed labor, the exploitation of humans to increase money and develop capital and that expropriating, enslaving and dispossessing means of life was creating the "worker", to the commodity producer... with which it will constitute the primary dogma of the commodity exchange society.

David Ricardo begins his foundational treatise on political economy (Principles of Political Economy) by stating, like his predecessors, "The value of a commodity, or the quantity of every commodity against which it is exchanged, depends on the relative quantity of labor necessary to produce it..." It is totally logical that this is the cornerstone of the entire generalized mercantile system, which functions with equality, liberty and fraternity, the basis of democracy. Like all bourgeois science, it does not start from historical experience, but from the primordial dogma of "science": its adaptation to bourgeois interests of explaining its world on the basis of the dogma of eternal justice, equality, liberty and fraternity that constitute the juridical basis of its entire system and its religion.

There is nothing fairer in this idyllic world than for the capitalist to charge for "his" accumulated labor in the same proportion that the workers charge for their living labor, by selling the commodities at "their value". That is why the affirmation that "value" is created by labor prospered as the foundation of bourgeois society and its power (it suited not only the accumulator of labor, but also its conciliation with the active labor force and ensures the maximum subsumption of labor in capital), and even left in the museum of history, to the previous theory (physiocracy) of "value" that had always affirmed that value has nature as its mother and work as its father, that industry and, in general, industrial work, did not contribute much, because the only thing it did was transform and not create anything that had more value.

20)

In reality, all these theories, both those of classical economics and those of physiocracy and also vulgar economics, confuse use value with exchange value, ideologically seeking the origin of value, in the thing itself (fetishism), in the commodity as a result of "labor." But in the thing, only the uses and physical substances of the materials that constitute the thing can be discovered, but there is no value, not an atom of social recognition. Not even a hundredth of money (value), that is, of true exchange value, which they say, should be found in that use-value, cannot be found in the thing.

When economists begin to explain the true exchange values, they come up against the evidence that commodities are NEVER exchanged for the work done, but as values being valorized: the true standard is not the thing but the value itself, that is, money, capital. That is why they end up recognizing that in reality this exists only in the change in that imaginary society, like that of Robinson and Friday on the desert island or that social model of equality, liberty and fraternity, but that in real society nothing is changed by contained labor but by the benefit of capital (tendency to equalize the rate of profit) as they end up recognizing, both David Ricardo and Karl Marx.

The problem is that economists always start from living or dead work, as if they were historical constants, without ever asking themselves where the work came from, which as we know, comes from torture (and not only "etymologically", but historically), from the three sticks (tripalium) to which you were hanged. Marx, who years earlier had denounced work as the communists and socialists of the time did, too determined by the Germanic Judaic social democracy, will sniff to the extreme of identifying production with work as if he were just another bourgeois economist, which will lead him to accept the labor theory of value and to identify "exploitation" with unpaid labor. in reality, it is not any contribution of Marx, but the very description that any mortal made secularly, to the extent that it is a biblical dogma (epistle of James ), which will constitute the very theory of surplus value of classical bourgeois economics.

In reality, what "creates" work are only "products of labor", that is, things and services (or "goods" as the most vulgar economists say). The fact that commodities are exchanged, in some proportion dependent on the work performed, actually hides the fact that the exchange is carried out in proportion to the valuation rates of capital, as it actually happens, as explained by economists and Marx himself (Volume III of Capital). This way of proceeding, appropriate to the ideological world of liberty, equality, fraternity, evidently implies all the robinson that everything originated in the "work of equals" in a world in which there is no money/capital and that all "equals" are producers. Beyond all the bourgeois mythology that is the foundation of economic science and the "law of value", it is important to understand that, socially, the Robinsoneadas, as ideologies complacent with the class conciliation proclaimed by bourgeois law and economy, are always part of the real social process of subsumption of the human being in capital, which includes all the historical falsification of identifying human production with labor and, therefore, humanity, with the production of values. As if money and capital themselves were also ETERNAL!

21)

But, no matter how much they turn the commodity, the thing, the Value itself, the real hard and sound Money, is not inside the thing itself, it is still nowhere to be found. There is no microscope with which to detect the amount of value in a thing. In the commodity itself, as a thing or service there is NOT an atom of value, while in money everything is value, even if there is not an atom of physical product.

The commodity only exists as a thing until it is socially valued. Only when value (which is the true subject of the operation) recognizes it as its peer, only when money recognizes it as part of its world, can the commodity be said to have this or that value.

But for the economist, labor is an ideological presupposition, as is the exchange of commodities for autonomous "producers" who present themselves to the market. So are a set of other hypotheses constitutive of that realm of equality, liberty and fraternity that the interests of his class dictate to him. Only in the most blatant Robinsoneada, only in that idyllic world of autonomous individual "producer" human beings, in that world that political economy designated as "simple commodity society" could "exchange value" be determined, as this bourgeois economic theory supposes, by the "socially necessary labor to produce a commodity" (David Ricardo's definition of abstract labor) to produce the products brought to market. Only in this way can the history of humanity be reduced to the history of the relations between proportions of hours worked, and even distort the history of slavery and exploitation in the theories of surplus value (absolute and relative) whose caricature is invariably: paid and unpaid hours of work (as if exploitation stopped after work!

That commercial company did not exist anywhere. There was never a society of free and equal men exchanging commodities. There are no independent free producers in history who buy and sell and put society together. All this vision is pseudo-scientific dogma, which constitutes the foundation from which bourgeois science is built. The exchange of commodities itself does not even begin within any type of human society, but between them, outside of them, or rather, in contacts, most of the time violent, that is, of war and rapine.

Moreover, whenever very different "societies" are found in history, some appear linked to agricultural production, to the community organized territorially according to production linked to mother earth and for which the concept of value or money..., has no other meaning than aggression, tribute, usury, prison and slavery. The other, on the contrary, the one that comes into contact is invariably a society of POWER AND MONEY and represents the very crushing of the human community, by imposing violence, tribute, debt, slavery, emission... The historical "encounter" is NEVER an encounter of equals... (in which case only mutual help, sharing..., "gifting" ...) but an encounter of action/destruction, aggression/expulsion, appropriation/exploitation, slavery/war..., in short, the imposition of MONEY-POWER... destroying the human community and subjecting dehumanized beings to the FALSE community of Money.
No doubt because brainwashing is much more real than money laundering, because all technological progress, the means of social imbecilization, circulation and communication make the very reality of the false be promoted as something totally non-existent, in order to pass as something that does not affect ordinary human beings. Because the relationship of forces of the proletarian movements clashes with the ideologies of the citizens that the right and above all the left of the bourgeoisie continue to manage to impose." Everything is so false that it does not exist," says the "anti-capitalist" and recites the idiotized citizen. Worse, they take pleasure in laughing, as if at the non-existence of God, without realizing that the world directed by the idea of God passes over them. The Marxist-Leninist repeats in chorus with him "all this stuff about the financial world is fiction and therefore cannot influence the reality of capital at all". Vulgar materialist atheism ignores the social force of religion, in the same way that the Marxist-Leninist economist ignores the power of falsehood, of the economy in which he lives. Both live jumping between vulgar materialism (which denies the life of ideas) and the world of ideas (their idea of work as the source of value). For this reason, they are incapable of explaining the importance of the false in the social relationship of forces and refer to capitalism today, as if fake money were something absurd that does not play any social role. And of course, the great weakness of the proletariat in its struggle, and particularly that of the yellow vests, is the strength of this ideology, which citizenizes and penetrates the different assemblies, demonstrations, preventing the development of its strength. Meanwhile the world plutocracy continues to print counterfeit banknotes, which it transforms into world surplus value, and the press continues to muddy everything, so that the world population continues not to realize that each counterfeit banknote impoverishes it a little more. As the model of exploitation is not based on an individual exchange between the bourgeois and the exploited, but on tyranny, on the issuance of money, on finance, on usury, on military domination... "Marxist" science, and political economy in general, declares that it is not exploitation, as if colonization and open war had not been the most general and complete form of man's exploitation of man. As if the historical arc of courage subduing the human being by violence were not the greatest constant in the history of class societies!
From "COMMUNISM 68"
INTERNATIONALIST COMMUNIST GROUP (ICG) 2025
https://icg-gci.kilombo.top/

THE HISTORY OF HUMANITY: THESES ON THE HISTORICAL ARC OF VALUE AND THE STATE 5

GCI — 2025-08-05T07:48:00Z

THE HISTORY OF HUMANITY:

THESES ON THE HISTORICAL ARC OF VALUE AND THE STATE 5

GCI
"The greatest triumph of the bourgeoisie of the twentieth century is to have made people believe everywhere that what there was in Russia was socialism, when in reality the [Leninist] counterrevolution had triumphed and capitalism was developing"
From the book "THE RUSSIAN COUNTER-REVOLUTION and the development of capitalism" Internationalist Communist Group (https://icg-gci.kilombo.top/spip.php?article29)

16)
The Big Lie of the "socialist" countries is more of the same. These countries never had an atom of "socialism" as proclaimed by the revolutionary proletarians of all times, whose revolutionary project had as its starting point the destruction of private property, money, capital, the market, the State and the reorganization of a true human society: the HUMAN COMMUNITY.

Even the expression "socialist countries" is FALSE. No country can, and never can be, "socialist". This denomination is a propaganda formula of those who control the world, of the financial aristocracy and of its social democratic agents (including "communists" and "anarchists"). It is based on the lie of the bourgeois parties for the workers, of the parties of labor (apologists for wage torture and statism), which call for the socialization and centralization of capital as a synonym for socialism. Legal nationalization is nothing more than a more violent phase of the power of value/money and of greater slavery for labor.

It was the basis of the entire Russian and world counterrevolution with Lenin, Trotsky, Stalin... at the head, which they called "socialist", "workers' state", "dictatorship of the proletariat"..., to the juridical centralization of CAPITAL (of the ownership of the means of production) and the obligatory nature of work. That is, to the real slavery imposed by capitalism. In reality, with the obligation to "sell" labor power to a single buyer (the government) and labor camps (CONCENTRATION), the countries concerned entered an even more tyrannical phase of capitalist slavery that will produce tens of millions of victims.

State terrorism, torture and the systematic disappearance of opponents (and/or their confinement in dungeons, jails, detention centers, barracks...), extends in many times and countries, to any social or population sector that wants to open its mouth and raise its head. The central characteristic of these countries is the totalitarian and systematic repression of any protest, as well as education at work and torture from childhood presented as the necessary sacrifice to deserve the kingdom of heaven: the oz and the hammer It is the modern and socialist version of the Christian cross, taking up the essentials of the mythology of the Jewish sacrifice in real life, to solidify the slave mode of production that capital imposed on all those countries falsely called "socialist".

What the so-called "socialist countries" did was to formalize the very tendency of money and capital to "socialize" the whole country, concentrate, centralize..., as they had done before and would continue to do in many regions and countries. Nationalization, the passage from individual to state property, not only does not eliminate at all the fact that human beings continue to be deprived of property, that private property continues to reign (since the producer continues to be deprived of the necessities of life), that not a gram of capitalism has been eliminated, but on the contrary it confirms it, as does CAPITALIST EXPLOITATION, that is, the exploitation of the whole people by the absolute reign of money. Money is the only COMMUNITY that exists in the "socialist countries" as it is all over the world.

The "socialists" and "communists" who carried out this process, what they achieved, was not at all an improvement in the development of the material productive forces as they had announced, nor a liberation from the exploitation of the proletariat, but on the contrary, an even more despotic development of capital: greater concentration and centralization of power in the State. greater tyranny in the social relations of production and exploitation. This was evidenced (and denounced by revolutionary groups throughout the world) with the terrorist obligation of work and the organization of all national production through the concentration camps founded by Lenin and Trotsky.

In reality, what the world bourgeoisie calls "communism or socialism" is the dream of capital itself to generalize slavery and the dictatorship of capital to the whole world. State centralization is the totalitarian foundation of this SLAVERY.

The concentration camp and despotism of labor, imposed on the slaves of capital for centuries in colonial or semi-colonial countries, becomes official state policy as a true guarantee of "socialism" (in reality, planned capitalism), in the same way that open dictatorship increasingly replaces, in the great powers, the "democratic" forms with which they cajoled public opinion Western public and Judeo-Christian, which ultimately predominate throughout the world.

17)
The historical struggle against the dictatorship of value and slavery is inherent in the origin of all forms of exploitation. Like exploitation, like dictatorship and domination, like the class struggle, like capital itself and its slave accumulation, it is thousands of years old.

Indeed, if there has been more and more dictatorship of capital and human slavery, it is because also, from the origin, of class societies, the ruling classes, manipulated parts of the abolitionist movement to direct their demands towards forms and "modes of production" compatible with that dictatorship of money. That is to say, the historical struggles for the social revolution were diverted and channeled by Gatopardist fractions that changed something, so that everything would continue as before, or better yet, as in the "liberated nations", or the supposed "socialist countries", for the dominant fractions of capital and in particular for the plutocracy.

The most classic historical example was when the struggle against slavery (and also, the struggle against feudalism, although due to the smaller territorial scope of this social formation, almost exclusively European, occupies an international secondary place), in half the world in the fifteenth to the nineteenth centuries, to the cry of "abolition", was channeled towards forms of free wage labor, which in the end recreated the very same conditions of slavery as before, with even more brutal conditions of exploitation, but with the exception of some regional fraction of proletarians put at the service of the Anglo-Saxon liberal-imperialist bourgeoisie and which received a greater part of what was produced for its services (what was called the complicity of the proletariat with "its own" State). In the 20th century, the same history of the FALSE abolition of capitalist slavery would be repeated, with the realization of the social democratic program, of the bourgeois parties for the proletariat and, most especially, by the Russian counterrevolution led by the Bolsheviks.

In the end, "abolition" had not triumphed, it cannot triumph without destroying the society of generalized money, capitalism. On the contrary, what was affirmed with this freedom to sell their labor power and specifically, with the slogans of liberty, equality and fraternity, was the liberal counterrevolution and the subjection, for the first time in the world, to the Anglo-Saxon and racist monotheistic plutocracy.

Those who were freer now (with the famous and propagandized "abolition"), were not the slaves, wage-earners (or not), but the capitals to promote the slave trade, to redistribute them around the world according to their needs and their profitability (the managers of capital argued that in each specific case the free worker was more profitable than the slave). The old and rotten imperialist and slave-owning capital conquered its life insurance, with that libertarian slogan, at the same time that it reproduced slavery in an expanded form.

We cannot enter here, into the historical controversies about whether the conditions of exploitation were even worse... or they improved, as the parties of labor say, that is, the "bourgeois parties for the workers". We only affirm that the improvements thanks to "free labor" have always been pure propaganda and that exploitation reaches its highest levels of degradation and slavery (greater destruction of the human community, greater slavery in the community of Money) precisely where labor is freer: more hours of work, more relative misery, more generalization of work and torture for the population and especially for children and the elderly.

They were never able to prove any improvement for humans. Let's take as an example the hours worked, where all the POWER lies saying that they work less and less. Supposedly "free" labor was accompanied by a general increase, in all countries, in surplus value (absolute and relative), an increase in the days worked, in the working day, an increase in the intensity of labor, an increase in the productivity of labor, and, therefore, in a generalized increase in exploitation.

Slaves in ancient times (China, Egypt, Persia, Rome, Greece...), were forced to work a few days and hours per month or week. It is in the tropical capitalist plantations, veritable slave farms (the merchandise produced were the "blacks" themselves), in the fifteenth to seventeenth centuries that for the first time work is imposed every day (except as Judaism indicates one or two days). This "innovation" also entails imposing many hours of work on each day.

But they cannot compete with the number of hours that a "free" worker is forced to work in the same period in European industry (between 10 and 18 hours a day). The more "free" (the less subordinated to local livelihoods) the more they work, economists proclaim. There are endless attempts by the slaveholders to impose a full schedule on the slaves, but the resistance is so high that they fail. The interesting thing is to see, for example, that, throughout the American continent, the decrees for slaves to work MORE provided, in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, that they were forced to work 8 hours: 4 in the morning, 4 hours of rest and 4 in the afternoon (legislation imposed by the Spanish crown for slaves in North America, of the Center and the South)

This shows to the extent that we have been lied to by the trade unions, the labour parties, the social democrats of all kinds ("communists", libertarians, Leninists, "anarchists" ...) and in general the official history: in the 21st and 20th centuries... many more hours of work are worked in the very modern European industry than in the slave plantations and in general in America, Asia, Africa and Oceania..., saying that free work was a progress for the exploited because the material conditions would be better.

INTERNATIONALIST COMMUNIST GROUP (ICG) 2025
https://icg-gci.kilombo.top/

Thesis on the Historical Arc of Value and the State 4 THE HISTORY OF HUMANITY: (4)

GCI — 2025-08-04T07:10:00Z

Thesis on the Historical Arc of Value and the State 4

THE HISTORY OF HUMANITY: (4)

"Money itself is the community and cannot bear any other above it."
Marx, Grundisse
12) Nothing could be more normal than those who continue to dominate and enslave humans, to put material goods and their creative work, the material modes of production, as the guide of history, and to propose, as the purpose of history, socialized, nationalized, planned capitalism with world governance.
We cannot be surprised at all that the general PLAN of the financial aristocracy, towards the New World Order, has as much Marxism-Leninism and "communism" as barracks, as the brutal confinement of humanity to destroy human life imposed from 2020.
We believe that this better explains our current struggle, spreading these theses against everything official, in which we emphasize, not the objects and modes of production of things, but the invariant relations of exploitation and oppression.
The slave-owning invariance of Money, from ancient Egyptian/Greek/or Roman society, to the unbridled monetary issuance of central banks since 2008/2009, from the slave trade to the World Economic Forum, denounced, always MORE, in the barricades and social struggles of the 21st century.

13) The official history is not only the history of the Kings and princes, of the republicans and democrats, of wars, of the left and the right, of the Pharaohs and political parties, of fascism and anti-fascism... but in general history told from the point of view of things, of progress, of the modes of production of things. All of this is official history, because they show you the showcase, the decorum, the sample, the surface, the fetishes..., systematically hiding the social relations of slavery and, most important of all: the historical and invariant struggle of humanity against MONEY and the STATE.
The history that really interests us, as proletarians enslaved by world capital, is that of class domination and oppression and the struggle against it, the history of the (invariably oppressive) state and communist struggles against all the authoritarianism of money, the historical resistance of the native communities in all parts of the world, against the courage in process and the consequent enslavement of all humanity...

The true starting point of a history of humanity is that of the destruction of productive communities. And as we said before, this destruction takes place at different times, in different places, to appropriate things or people of different types and colors, but invariably by the same historical subject: value in process, CAPITAL, physical/military power concentrated in a class which, invariably, concentrates power (over the other communities) in the treasury, temple, money, capital, investment fund, usurious bank, issuing bank..., armies, intelligence services, institutions...

14) The periodization of the history of humanity, as if, thanks to the development of the productive forces, life would be better and better is totally false.
The periodization of it on the immediate modes of which humans produce is not only false but an ideological construction of the bourgeois parties for the workers (slavery, feudalism, capitalism, socialism) especially of the parties of labor, whose true creed is always the progress of value: "We have to do the bourgeois democratic tasks." Its idealization of capital and its progress toward socialism, typical of Bernstein/Kautsky to Lenin/Trotsky/Stalin, is the same as that of bourgeois economics.
In reality, the progress of capital has been the progress of slavery , increasingly generalized of humans, regardless of the Germanic, Asian, tributary, capitalism, socialism "mode of production"...
That is precisely why the official history, the one written by the financial aristocracy, the one that served as the basis for imposing Leninism, Stalinism, Maoism and the current "communist" ideological systems ... They deny everything that has been constant in history: the social relations of slavery, domination and oppression. The last straw has been the reification of money itself, denying it as a social and historical reality of exploitation and oppression, to the point of ideologically "transforming" it into an object, a necessary evil, a simple means of exchange and therefore compatible with that "socialism" which is nothing more than the legal nationalization of capitalism.
Let us be even more explicit, to criticize/destroy the NARRATIVE made by capital itself. We are not at all interested in the biology of capital elaborated by its science (classical bourgeois economics), but in its necrology emerging throughout the planet from resistance to slavery, money and the State. The revolutionary critique of class society is not concerned with the progress of money and its democratic and/or socialist successes, but in the human struggle for the TOTAL DESTRUCTION OF MONEY AND EXPLOITATION.

There was not, for example, slavery first and then feudalism. That is the FALSE, and super restricted, version of history, from the point of view of Eurocentric (and racist) feudalism. The historical truth is totally different, in reality it will be capitalism, that is, globalized money, which will take slavery to its maximum expression in the seventeenth, eighteenth, nineteenth, twentieth and twenty-first centuries. Moreover, this maximum expression of money and capital ending their process of human slavery (because the anatomy of man allows us to understand that of the ape, despite the fact that Darwinian theory itself is totally false) allows us to understand much more clearly that, from the very origin the "value in process" (money), is the true subject of the destruction of the human community and, consequently of the slavery of the human being.
This falsification of history to present capitalism as a great advance over the "previous modes of production" is based on 2 MOTHER IMPOSTURES, which are its foundation:
– The FALSE history of the capitalist economy emerging idyllically and religiously from the free market of equals.
– The FALSE History of the Emergence of "Socialist Countries" in the 20th Century

15) In reality, it is hidden that the idyllic market of capital, of free and equal individuals buying and selling objects necessary for their lives, never existed. It is an "objective" "scientific" model, based on central dogmas of bourgeois science, to resemble even more the exact sciences such as physics, chemistry, cosmography..., which by definition would be "objective" sciences. Economics is constituted as a science precisely by extracting from history, the experimental and subjective reality of the will to domination, oppression and slavery.
Only what is "objective" is "scientific", regardless of the will of the subjects, only "scientific" is that which does not depend on the will to enslave and exploit, but the objective laws of exploitation that are independent of the will of the exploited and the exploiter. All the laws of this objective world of the economy extract the true racist, slave-owning, Eurocentric history of Judaism and its sects (Christians, Jesuits, Freemasons, Islamists, Zionists...) from the "chosen people", the social and real basis of the dictatorship of MONEY (monotheism), to make the entire ideological model of "the historical evolution" of the market "with objective laws such as physics" be departed. as economists will say. All economic science comes from that ORIGINAL SIN, from the Supreme Dogma that defines the very origin of the economy in the market, being born spontaneously among autonomous individuals. Just as Darwinism sought to rewrite the history of the struggles of the species in terms of its Judaic Euroracism, applying Malthus's own ideology as the central dogmas of the model, economists would build their vision of society and the world according to that central dogma that is the market. For them, society is the market and it has objective laws, such as the "law of value", such as the secular and popular mythology that the "value of things" depends on the work that has incorporated things.

As in all other sciences, it is defined as "objective" and "scientific", not what has been empirically verified, but what is consistent with the thinking of the plutocracy of its time. By definition, "non-scientific" and "non-objective" is that which is the empirical result of human experience, such as the use of plants for human health or cosmic knowledge to organize the production of what is necessary. In no case should the model of commodity exchange of free and independent producers be tested..., it is the very definition of economic science that seeks to derive laws of the production and exchange of things, from that ideological model.
In economics, the first dogma is, precisely, to explain money (not as a social relation of exploitation, but), as a thing and from things, as if it arose "objectively" from exchange, as it was transformed into a general equivalent, as if it were an object that becomes money to the extent that it is an equivalent as economists from Aristotle to Marx affirmed, passing through all kinds of mercantilist economists. physiocrats, classics, neoclassicals...; which obviously presupposes at the same time denying the real history of humanity that saw money become (regardless of the different things in which, according to the times and geographical coordinates it was represented) as a social power of enslavement and domination.
Marx laughs, when the classics want to deduce the laws of capital, money and the commodity, through the typical Robinsoneads of two men who meet on an island without their respective social determinations, but ends up accepting the most gigantic of all the Robinsoneads of the economists: that of deducing the economic laws of a society of independent producers who would contribute the fruit of their labor to exchange and from where, Economic science deduces "the law of labor value." All subsequent deductions are, of course, only "scientific", modelable..., but they are not verified experimentally, nor do they have anything to do with the true history of humanity and the development of MONEY as a value in process, enslaving, destroying communities, imposing taxes, demanding usury, arming police and armies....
In real history (apart from these dogmas), exchange is always preceded, determined, and even armed by war, tribute, slavery, and usury. The true "market" always implies the secular historical action of VALUE demolishing, enslaving, starving... (the famous imperial frigates), destroying every human community, turning human life into dust, until creating the free "individual" who will be the (FALSE) subject of political economy and of that free market between equal "beings", to hide the true subject of CRIME (value) of what they will later call: "capitalist mode of production". Real history shows that value does not arise from exchange, but precedes and arms it, according to the very needs of value by valorizing.
That is why the "objectivity of economic laws" is as false as the Darwinian theory of the "evolution of species", the "law of labor value" as the law of contagion and the prejudice of blaming viruses and bacteria for diseases: what is presented as "objective" evolution is the ideological vision , racist, classist... of the bourgeoisie modeling its world according to its interests, that is to say, of capital modeling militarily and slave-owning, its market and therefore "its world". The robinson deeds of classical economics, as well as the explanation of value from the free and independent "labor" of the producers, have NOTHING to do with real history, with the process of real money destroying the human community.
It is not markets that create wars, but on the contrary, all markets in history are the result of war and slavery, and their consolidation, as markets are invariably the product of submission to slavery and/or of pacts and peace of warring forces. The exchanges of secular things between communities have nothing to do with trade. In such cases, there is no value either, and the "exchange" of things has nothing to do with any exchange of equivalents: today anthropology accepts that things were not exchanged as if they had something in common, but as gifts and only to offer pleasure.
On the other hand, the markets for materials and labor power have always been the result of wars between capitalist and imperialist forces, as well as the genocide of races considered inferior, the massacres of "competitors" and peoples, slavery with and without phrases. It was the concentration and centralization of capital in the Empires, aristocracies and races "chosen by God", which made their fortune with tribute and usury, which set up the capital markets that control and dispute the materials (gross and premium), without one party ever accusing the other of monopoly or monopsony, because the competition between them (and therefore the war between capitals and bourgeois fractions), which is to be found in the very nature of value in process, are constitutive of its own "nature."
All this becomes even clearer when these markets refer to labor power, sold as a slave or consolidated as a wage slave, with the myth of the freedom to sell one's life for wages. It should not be forgotten for a moment that this freedom to have nothing to sell but their skin, or that of their children (which defines the proletariat), is the result of¬¬¬ centuries of state terrorism, to destroy common life, to "liberate" (dispossess, expropriate) human beings from all property and from all contact with the natural means of life. ¬¬¬¬¬¬
The destruction of the community and human life by State terrorism for millennia is the only true historical foundation of the world's Money exploiting and oppressing humanity in all corners of the world and in all the "countries" armed for this purpose.
INTERNATIONALIST COMMUNIST GROUP (ICG) 2025
https://icg-gci.kilombo.top/

THE HISTORY OF HUMANITY: THESIS ON THE HISTORICAL ARC OF VALUE AND THE STATE 3

2025-08-03T16:48:00Z

3THE HISTORY OF HUMANITY:

THESIS ON THE HISTORICAL ARC OF VALUE AND THE STATE

GCI

Money does not arise from fiefdom, in the same way that it does not arise from nature or the primitive community, but, as money, it acts between societies dissolved by predatory war, slavery, repression and state terrorism.

To summarize, money does not develop inside the fiefdom, but outside and against the feudal social structure. Value in process does not arise from the intrinsic limits of feudalism, as economists and historians say, but on the basis of its own process of accumulation (outside and against productive structures) based on credit, monetary development and world trade.

As for slavery, the falsification is even more gigantic, because the bourgeois economist places slavery as the original sin of the economy, in the famous "primitive accumulation" when slavery is the essence of the historical development of money and its transformation (which we prefer to call affirmation) into capital.

It is not only Adam Smith who situates the real history of the economy and society as an original sin alien to the development of capital itself, but the whole of bourgeois political economy, including cultural and social democratic Marxism, Stalinist and Trotskyist Marxism-Leninism. All of them call an idyllic world of mercantile exchange where everything is liberty, equality, fraternity and above all the development of productive forces a "strictly capitalist mode of production".

It is a lie that "work" creates value. The productive activity of the native community does not produce values, it only produces objects useful to the human species. These same objects are transformed into values by the appropriation by another society, the false community of money. The true source of value is appropriation, slavery, the application of force by the money society against human societies, expropriation and not productive activity.

The entire historical arc of value is violence, forced appropriation, slavery. There is not an atom of human needs in the origin and historical development of capital. In the same way as with the generalization of commodity production, i.e. the globalization of capital, there will not be an atom of value in the productive activity of humans: the valorization of value is always exploitation/appropriation.
... From its origin, money does not come into the world from equality and fraternity. On the contrary, money, even in its "pre-flood" forms, does not start from peace and equality but from war, conquest, forced appropriation, compulsory tribute, direct slavery, debt and/or usury, as debt slavery, monetary issuance...
MANUSCRIPTS (1982/88)

9)
That is why bourgeois economy, that is to say, CAPITAL, theorizing about the historical generalization of the commodity, permanently "confuses" use value, which is the utility that the object offers to human beings, with the exchange relation between commodities, which would depend, they say, on the "labor contained" in commodities. He even tries (with Smith, Ricardo, Marx...) to establish a quantitative relationship between the real value of commodities, as they are exchanged on the market, and the actual expenditure of physical energy used (exchange value). Hence, in the so-called history of the commodity, economists begin by affirming that it is "labor" (falsely identified with the activity of humans to produce what they need) that determines the exchange value of commodities.

When it is then found that NONE of this works in the real economy, instead of recognizing that it is a historical absurdity to derive value and therefore money, which is a historical relationship of exploitation, usury, war, from a market in which the opposite is presupposed (that producers and sellers are free and equal, with identical organic composition of capital...!) All economists end up accepting that no product is exchanged in capitalism according to the hours actually worked. A clear conclusion reached by the greatest exponent of classical economics, David Ricardo, and which Marx reaffirms by saying that in reality things are NOT changed according to the labor they have incorporated, but according to the cost of production (David Ricardo) or the prices of production (Karl Marx): Capital volume III.

10)
As the physiocrats said, the mother of "value" is the land and its father is work. Of course, here, by "work" (like all the ruling and exploiting classes) we do not mean the social reality of work, that is to say torture, slavery, exploitation, but exclusively... the activity of material production of the objects necessary for human life.

Classical economics, including Marx, will recognize the validity of this statement for the whole of human history, but only if this statement refers exclusively to the thing, as a use value and to the point of view of the reproduction of the objects necessary to the life of any society. In strict terms: Neither the land, nor in work create values, but products necessary to life, which in themselves do NOT have an atom of "value".

A community of producers, a society in which all humans produce, is a society that does not produce values, because production is exclusively of necessary products. Moreover, the society of producers does not even exchange, by definition there is neither autonomy of producers, much less trade, money or values. Value, money, exists only IN FRONT of the society of free producers, acting as an external power and dissolving the community of producers.

In a society subject to money, the opposite happens, because capital exercises a real dictatorship over all productive activity. Values exist regardless of what is produced or worked. Or, to put it another way, a $100 bill can have the same VALUE as 5 kilos of meat or 100 liters of mineral water..., even though the quantities of labor are totally different and the "Marxist-Leninist" imbecilized by the "labor theory of value" (of classical economics), protests by saying that "that is not equitable" ("they are not equal values"): theory of "unequal exchange", pseudo-anti-imperialist.

In that case, everything has the same VALUE, 100 dollars, even if the work actually done to produce the 5 kilos of meat and the 100 liters of water contains more or less what (let's say) 50 hours of work and the 100 dollar bill does not contain a single second of productive human activity. The latter happens with all counterfeit money, created by central banks in a totally independent way of the reserve requirements that would guarantee some component of "productive and labor truth".

In reality, neither today, in the total subsumption of humanity in value, nor in its origin thousands of years ago, does value depend on the amount of work done to produce a commodity, as the religion of political economy claims. That was always a fairy tale! Things in themselves have no value, only the society of value, that is, of MONEY and generalized commodity production, can attribute value to a thing. Value only values value. And the things necessary to human life are products, but not values. Only when they are appropriated, only when, as private property, they are brought to a market can they exist or NOT (commodity somersault), as values. Or, rather, only when they are recognized as part of the community of value, that is, of money, are they really values. But the only real expression of value is money itself, which is value in itself. Only subsumed in the real community of money, only as values interchangeable with any other value of the same quantum, do they exist as a FALSE community of humans and are recognized as such.

Historically, in the primitive community there was no work, there could be no values. Only violent appropriation, by war, rapine, slavery..." it produced" values, that is, it transformed into capital what had arisen for human life.
Although today we are shocked to understand that those who "produced" values, in reality "appropriated" objects that, in their possession, were transformed into values, the true subject of the "production of values" is always money, capital, the capitalist.

The slaveholders of yesterday and today transform the thing into value, when their society (slave) values the object in money and consecrates itself as a precise exchange value exchangeable in the capitalist market. But they also consecrate value by appropriating, oppressing, enslaving, just as they do when they impose taxes on the lower classes by exploiting them. And also when they receive taxes imposed by violence or, in short, subject human beings to debt or usury. Subsumption in money is precisely the leap in quality of the inclusion/domination of the human being in capital.

Nor does money arise from the community of human life and production, but from its exterior, from its frontier and can only be imposed by the violence of MONEY as a false community by means of war, slavery, tribute extorted by violence, usury, consolidation and issuance of debt.

Since the dissolution of the primitive community, only those values are those that are recognized in the community of money, whether or not they have contained work, that is why a false bill can have value if it is recognized as a value or is imposed by a centralized power, that is why water can have value if it is appropriated by the owners of money and finds a buyer or imposes it in advance in populations that have no other access to that vital element.

The same is true of the value of land, rent, or the appropriation of air for breathing—value does not depend at all on the quantity of labor, but on appropriation, rapine, and monopolization. The exchange of equals is pure lies, extracted from the old confusion between what is useful to the human being and value, between human need and the imposition of the dictatorship of money, to buy it.

In reality, the eternal historical confusion about value, which is invariably reduced to identifying human use value with value, stems from the bourgeois interest in selling capitalism (and its socialization) as the final station of human history. This, in turn, presupposes accepting that the current society is the egalitarian association of producers, free and independent, who instead of contributing money (values) contribute to the defined society, as a synonym for the market (another ahistorical hypothesis!) "commodities" that would be produced by the wear and tear of their labor forces and without any of them having accumulated labor and/or capital.

As Marx says in his critique of the classical economists, quoted above, everything is a vicious circle, capital only values capital. In real life, as opposed to the idyllic world of recognizing work as if it were value, only money is value, only that which "has" a value and can be exchanged for money is value. Not a hundredth of useful labour is recognised as value, neither 1000 years ago, nor in the present phase of capitalism.

As all those economists who make the difference between the useful object and value, including Marx, will affirm, they will recognize that in capitalism products are not exchanged for the labor contained in them, but for prices and/or costs of production, which as is known is a relationship of capital with its own valorization. The equalization of the rate of profit of capital determines the "prices of production," i.e., the VALUES at which commodities are exchanged.

The production of human means of life, of truly human activity, both today and in the primitive community or in isolated groups of humans is WORTHLESS. Conversely, the bill of exchange, the cheque or the banknote that does not have a second of work incorporated, has the value that it can buy with this paper, that is to say, it enters the community of money at the price that capital recognizes.

Only value creates value, money, capital is the true and only subject and criterion of value. That is the vicious circle of the reality of money, that is real and invariant capitalism.

MONEY as a (FALSE) COMMUNITY, is the only "thing" in common that remains to the slaves as a means to procure something to subsist on, when they no longer have even the sample of their true community, of their true HUMANITY.

11)

The official history is, so to speak, the history of the colored mirrors that the slaveholders put in a showcase, to realize their true class objectives, which is none other than slavery and domination itself. This history has in turn 2 inseparable aspects: the apology of its heroes, gods, pharaohs, emperors, republics, kings, princes, ayatollahs, monks, trade unionists, politicians, parliamentarians... and the apology of material progress, of objects and progress in the control of nature at the service of society as a whole. Or, to put it another way, official history puts in the showcase and pedestal its own historical representatives and the modes of production of things that are supposed to be made for the whole of society at that time.

History as seen by slaves, serfs, proletarians, outcasts... it cannot be anything other than the critique of that history. Not only denouncing all classes and characters of domination, wars and oppression in each period or region, but also denouncing that history of progress conceived by the oppressors, as if each mode of production of things had been an advance for humans to the capitalist paradise and its planned socialization.

It is necessary to criticize the very conception of history, seen as a constant progress of the material, of history seen as the progress of successive modes of production that are ever better for humans, whose supreme caricature will be the Marxist-Leninist construction: slavery, feudalism, capitalism, socialism... Marxism-Leninism is, in this sense, the highest point of bourgeois economic science, crowning classical economics, as the end point of the history of progress. Their socialism is the supreme dictatorship of capital and the world state. Throughout the twentieth century, the doctrine of the Judaic/Jesuit/Freemason sects that run the universities, secret services, entertainment industries and in general all the State apparatuses in the shadows of the "New World Order" of Capital was consecrated as the economic science par excellence.

The principle of this critique (of the economy and its history) is precisely what we assume in this text, showing that, regardless of the mode of production of things, exploitation and domination have remained unchanged, for thousands of years, that regardless of the colored mirrors (things, the "mode of production"), put in display case by the world plutocracy, human beings are getting worse and worse.

Exploitation and oppression is what really progresses.

What "improves" with the development of money and its power is the subsumption of all humanity into capital.

We return to the distinction between use value and value, thing and money, to affirm that the history of the apology for the development of use values, the history of modes of production (of the things necessary to live), hides the fact that relations of exploitation and oppression have made this world increasingly contrary to the freedom of humans. The invariance of the social relation of capital is only a progress of exploitation and oppression. But not only are the historical relations of exploitation and domination increasingly slave-like and despotic, but the same objects (produced by the dictatorship of money) are increasingly contrary to humanity: the ever more massive manufacture of weapons of destruction instead of objects necessary for human beings.

That is to say, that material progress determined by the historical dictatorship of value over the objects produced and the modes of production, of the rate of profit and the rate of exploitation against human life only produces destruction, intoxication, junk food, toxics, extermination, genocide...

INTERNATIONALIST COMMUNIST GROUP (ICG) 2025
https://icg-gci.kilombo.top/

THE HISTORY OF HUMANITY: THESIS ON THE HISTORICAL ARC OF VALUE AND THE STATE 2

GCI — 2025-08-02T16:22:00Z

THE HISTORY OF HUMANITY:

THESIS ON THE HISTORICAL ARC OF VALUE AND THE STATE 2

GCI
The success of the lie is what allows the false to be constituted as a value, that the lie is today the only truth of global capital and world governmental power. And as it is popularly said, the lie brings another lie..., until everything is a lie... With honorable exceptions, no one denounces counterfeit money as counterfeit and counterfeit money as the most important scam in the history of humanity. Nor is there any talk of the consequent relative decrease in material production in that mass of false (as a percentage of GDP) and even less, of the reduction in the production of use values that human beings need so much...
COMMUNISM 68

Money is substantially the development of value constituted in a granary or treasure. Its process of growth and consolidation as a "community" different and opposed to the rest of the communities has, as its only objective, "more money", accumulation of capital and the State. Money is, from its origin, the value in the process of community imposition, of growth and concentration, destruction of every human community.

As a value itself, it does not arise from the thing itself, nor from the "work" to produce that thing, as bourgeois political economy maintains, but from appropriation, from deprivation, from violence concentrated in a pole other than that of the production of what is necessary for the reproduction of the human species. In this sense, value is private property, expropriation of one social group from another that produces (tribute, usury, slavery...), or it is developed as value and power in the intermediation between different human groups (debt, issuance, destruction of local production, "forced exchange", trade of "equals" ...)

Usury, tribute, trade, slavery, monetary issuance... they are the forms par excellence of the original accumulation of value for thousands and thousands of years. In all cases there is always the component of war and repression as an essential condition for the accumulation of value, of capital.

A civilization based exclusively on the power of a class and the state was never found, without the accumulation of value, without its concentration and centralization by power.

There is no throne without treasure. Moreover, the center where value is accumulated is always the center of power. The origin of the centralization of authority and ancient despotism is the treasury, the temple, the throne, which in its process of empowerment will be a bank, government, armed power, empire, plutocratic imperial aristocracy ruling the world...

The "man" of the ruling class, that is, the bourgeoisie, the slave owner and more particularly the plutocrat, created god and shaped him according to his interests, so the center of the treasury was the Ministry of Relations with the "beyond". The temple became a bank, the concentration of the treasury was subsumed through slavery, usury, war and its derivatives (tribute, trade...) ... until it can issue certificates of deposit, debt and exchange, to extend its territorial domination around the world. Fiat money and central banks will be the superior instruments of that generalized subsumption of human beings in money and capitalism that will subjugate all humanity.

Value, money, capital, three "concepts" to designate one and the same subject throughout the history of humanity. It is the secular subject of despotism and exploitation. It comes into the world dripping blood and mud everywhere. Exploitation and domination are invariably imposed by violence, war, slavery, trafficking, torture...

6)
Official history, economic and political science, religion, law, the church, governments, schools and universities... they have as a nodal project of their foundation to hide this process, developing the mythology that value and money would come from the idyllic world of the exchange of equal beings.

In its Eurocentric (and racist version of the "chosen people"), capitalism would come from feudalism, simultaneously affirming that capitalism is not slavery, but an enormous advance with respect to all that they define as "previous or pre-capitalist modes of production". Of course, this contains the lie that this supposed incipient capitalism within European feudalism was not based on the slavery throughout the world that that same capitalism imposed. All the falsification hides the slave-like reality of capital and shows capitalism as the product of an idyllic system of peace, equality and prosperity.

In real history, capital does not come from feudalism but from money (which develops outside and against the fiefdom itself), from money capital subsuming the world, from usury, from extortion and tribute, from war, slavery and ultimately from the terrorist destruction of native communities throughout the world.

The ideological construction of all the social sciences, from political economy to sociology or political sciences, and even Universal History itself, is based on that FALSE starting point, that "capitalism" comes from feudalism and that this change of "mode of production" (sic) is operated by the internal contradictions of feudalism that limited the progress of humanity.

The bloodthirsty role of capital throughout the history of humanity is concealed by replacing it with that of "work" that appears as the hero of progress, of the development of the productive forces and the enormous development of the values of human use, seeking in this way to arouse popular support and present capitalism itself as a great benefit for humanity itself.

With this, the circle of the history of barbarism is closed and the idyllic world of work, that is, of torture and slavery, is consecrated as the positive culmination of human life and activity.

With great fanfare it is announced: this permanent and good progress for all is the Capitalist Mode of Production! A veritable vicious circle of progress, equality and happiness in which the reconciliation of exploited and exploiting classes is the sole program of the State, as proclaimed by the Europeanist (racist) Judeo-Christian civilization, the "American way of life" (Yankee) and/or Leninism in power.

But, deceive yourself, my friend, when bourgeois economics and history say that exchange value is due to labor, they do not refer to real, concrete, historical "labor," which produces objects for human consumption, but to the idyllic image of it. They are not talking about the real history of work, that is, of secular torture and the 3 sticks (work comes etymologically from "three sticks") on which those who were subjected to oppression and exploitation were hanged, they are not talking about the real slave trade that allowed all the historical accumulation of 50 or 100 centuries of slave capital consolidated in European and/or Asian secular imperialisms.

When bourgeois political economy proclaims that "the source of value of all commodities produced is labour", far from thinking of slaves (wage-earners or not, as human productive activity) and the real transformation of things, it is thinking of the valorisation of capital, of the subsumption of that human activity in the creation of value. For political economy, capital is only "accumulated labor" and legitimately appropriated by those who worked before. Labor is capital and capital is labor is the fundamental historical maxim of all economic science.

That is to say, political economy is the very justification of the bourgeoisie as the class representing Labor, of the Third Estate. The bourgeoisie is, from the point of view of economic science, the working class par excellence, as a dynamic element of the Third Estate that opposes the parasites, i.e., the clergy and the nobility, the landowners and the "non-productive" bureaucracy. The whole of classical economics that will affirm that value is produced by labor is thinking of the class that represents labor, both all accumulated labor and the living labor that it buys thanks to its historical labor.

The bourgeoisie defines itself on the basis of all these lies of history, as a class that owns past work, of the work that adds value and productively directs the whole process of valorization.

As Marx says in the chapter on "primitive accumulation" invented by political economy:

We have seen how money is converted into capital, how surplus value comes out of it, and more capital comes out of surplus value. However, the accumulation of capital presupposes surplus value; surplus value, capitalist production, and this, the existence in the hands of the commodity producers of large masses of capital and labor power. This whole process seems to move within a vicious circle, from which we can only get out by assuming an "original" accumulation prior to capitalist accumulation ("previous accumulation", as Adam Smith calls it), an accumulation that is not the fruit of the capitalist regime of production, but its starting point.

This primitive accumulation comes to play in political economy more or less the same role that original sin plays in theology. Adam bit the apple and with it sin spread to all mankind. The origins of primitive accumulation are intended to be explained by telling them as an anecdote from the past. In very ancient times, we are told, there was, on the one hand, a hard-working, intelligent and above all thrifty elite, and on the other, a crowd of shirtless, lazy people, who squandered everything they had and even more. The legend of original theological sin tells us how man was condemned to earn his bread by the sweat of his face; The story of the original economic sin reveals why there are people who do not need to sweat to eat. Never mind. This explains why while the former accumulated wealth, the latter ended up having nothing to sell but their skin. From this original sin springs the poverty of the great mass that even today, in spite of how much they work, has nothing to sell but themselves and the wealth of the few, wealth that does not cease to grow, even though its owners have long since stopped working. It is these insubstantial trifles that M. Thiers, for example, still serve, with the poise and seriousness of a statesman, the French, once so ingenious, in defense of propriété. But as soon as the problem of property arises, it becomes a sacrosanct duty to embrace the point of view of the infant booklet, as the only one that fits all ages and all stages of development. It is well known that in real history conquest, enslavement, robbery and murder, violence, in a word, play a great role. But in sweet political economy idyll has always reigned. The only sources of wealth have been from the first moment law and "work", except, of course, "the current year". In reality, the methods of primitive accumulation were anything but idyllic.

8)
As we said at the beginning of these theses, all official history is false, everything is deliberately and scientifically disrupted. Classical political economy is the determining social science of all bourgeois historical falsification, although it is evidently based on all religions, dogmas and secular sciences.

What appears as human activity progressing to produce more things and allow for better material well-being, is what they want to show us. It is the "positive" side that deeply hides the historical crime of capital advancing at the expense of war, slavery, torture, despotism...

They hide above all that value, capital... it is despotism and slavery and they show us, as if selling colored mirrors to the ignorant, Indians and blacks, the objects, the use values, the so-called "productive forces" ... And, of course, in all this letter of introduction and propaganda of capitalism, they put "labor value" at the center, as if it could be equivalent to human production and reproduction.

Historically, this apology for work as a value was the historical work of the "bourgeois parties for the workers" (as the revolutionaries of the eighteenth to the twentieth centuries called them), the social parties, the socialist, communist, social democratic parties...

In reality, although all things are the product of productive human activity, in the exchange of commodities, in "capitalism", this only concerns use value, the thing itself and the "work" useful to produce it. None of that is valued in capitalism. In capitalist commodity production, commodities are not exchanged according to embodied "labor" (as bourgeois economists believe, or make believe); but on the contrary, according to the allocation of capital to the production of each commodity, which implies the tendency to equalize the rate of profit and what all economists, including Marx, designate as the cost or price of production. What does it include, from its origin, the capital invested and the surplus value/profit corresponding to the tendency to the equalization of profit itself! The market of things thus shows to what extent it is subject to the valuation of value and that the exchange value of things only contains capital valorizing, regardless of whether or not it obeys a need of humans.

Bourgeois political economy has precisely as its foundation to make this generalized upheaval by presenting the real and historical such as violence and slavery as alien to capitalism, in order to affirm capitalism and "free labor" as an indispensable phase in the progress of humanity. This is the general method of political economy, which will later be assumed by social democracy in general and Marxism-Leninism as the ideology of work and the state religion. The idyllic origin of capital is the first stone of the entire ideological edifice of political economy, that is, of the apologetic biography of capitalism.

INTERNATIONALIST COMMUNIST GROUP (ICG) 2024/25
https://icg-gci.kilombo.top/